Jeremy Jahn vs Ryota Kishi Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W L L
Form
L L W L W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Jahn 1 - 0 Kishi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jahn winning 2 and Kishi winning 0. The last match between Jahn and Kishi was at the Italy F25 (Cornaiano), 08-08-2017, First, Clay with Jeremy Jahn getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeremy Jahn | 1 |
| Ryota Kishi | 0 |
| Jahn | Stats | Kishi |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 894 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 197 | Highest Rank | 860 |
| 35 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (305-243) | Career Total W/L | 49% (118-124) |
| $2,285 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Ryota Kishi
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:10:0 | Average Match Time | 1:10:0 |
| 57% (32/56) | 1st Serve % | 55% (27/49) |
| 84% (27/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (18/27) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 49% (24/49) | Return Points Win % | 30% (17/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jeremy Jahn vs Ryota Kishi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jahn 1 - 0 Kishi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jahn has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kishi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jahn, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kishi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jahn has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kishi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jahn has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kishi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jahn has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 229/ 170), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kishi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 68/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jahn winning 1 times and Kishi being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jahn winning 2 and Kishi winning 0. The last match between Jahn and Kishi was at the Italy F25 (Cornaiano), 08-08-2017, First, Clay with Jeremy Jahn getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jahn and Kishi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jahn winning 0 times and Kishi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jahn winning 0, and Kishi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jahn has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kishi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jahn has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kishi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jahn has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kishi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jeremy Jahn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Jeremy Jahn
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jeremy Jahn
49%
(
61 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
82)
42%
(
27 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Kai Wehnelt
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Jeremy Jahn
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Alec Deckers
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Jeremy Jahn
89%
(
57 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
0-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Jasza Szajrych
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryota Kishi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Ryota Kishi
43%
(
38 of
89)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
7
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ryota Kishi
Player
Kyohei Yamanaka
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ryota Kishi
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Jahn vs Kishi?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jahn Vs Kishi is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (305/243) | Win/Loss | 49% (118/124) |
| 56% (702/552) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (264/270) |
| 53% (6161/5494) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (2347/2398) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1103 | Aces Total | 113 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1349 | Total Double Faults | 136 |
| 1:7:31 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 569.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 396.93 |
| 59% (15815/26805) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2216/3503) |
| 69% (10841/15815) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1338/2216) |
| 50% (5502/10989) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (556/1287) |
| 44% (1220/2777) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (148/339) |
| 41% (10852/26405) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1399/3532) |
| 57% (304/533) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (114/236) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (90/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (25/47) |
| 46% (78/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (23/54) |
| 84% (329/277) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (125/110) |
| 15% (329/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (125/15) |
| 13% (219/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (117/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
